| Generic name: CHAMAESIPHON A. Braun et Grunow, 1865. – In Rabenhorst, Algen Eur. Decaden 72/73: 1726. - nomen conservandum
|
Synonyms:
ARISTELLA Kutzing 1834
BRACHYTHRIX A. Braun in Rabenhorst, 1865. Fl. Eur. Alg. 2: 118.
SPHAEROGONIUM Rostafinski 1883
GODLEWSKIA Janczewski 1883 incl.
CHAMAESOPHONIPSIS Fritsch 1929
|
| Diagnosis:
|
| Type species: Chamaesiphon confervicola A. Braun in Rabenhorst 1865 |
Description:
Komárek & Anagnostidis (1998): Cells heteropolar, slightly or distinctly elongate, attached by their bases to the substrate (stones, plants), to the margin of sheaths of their mother cells or radially and more or less parallely arranged in gelatinous colonies; solitary cells, or micro- to macroscopic colonies, which are shrub-like, more or less spherical (with radially arranged cells in common mucilage) or flat (composed of a few layers of densely and parallely clustered cells). Cells spherical, later growing in club-shaped, cylindrical, pear-shaped, oval or ellipsoidal form; always enveloped by a sheath (pseudovagina), which is thin, colourless or slightly lamellate and yellowish or brownish, opening at the apex after cell division and exocyte separation, at the base usually narrowed and sometimes ending in an adhering pad (disc, sometimes with a very short stipe); the cells are sometimes slightly withdrawn from the base of a sheath; in some species the sheaths are diffluent forming a gelatinous mass, in which daughter cells remain enclosed. Cell content homogeneous, sometimes with distinguishable chromatoplasma (thylakoids are wavy, situated principially parietally but in several modifications, sometimes partly protruding into the centroplasma), in several species with prominent, solitary granules (cyanophycin, carboxysomes); cell content usually pale blue-green, yellowish, olive-green, greyish, pinkish or reddish-violet, sometimes almost colourless (the colour changes in numerous species in one and the same colony.
Komárek (1992): Unicellular; solitary, more or less elongated cells or groups of cells joined to the substrate /subg. Chamaesiphon/, or forming microscopic shrub-like colonies or layered, narrow mats with densely and parallely gathered cells on stones or submersed plants, perpendicularly oriented to the substrate /,subg: Godlewskia (Janczewski)Geitler 1925/. Cells always polarized, joined to the substrate with one (basal) end by means of a small mucilaginous pad (cells without pads occur only in upper parts of multilliyered colonies); cells oval, cylindrical or club-shaped, rounded at the apex. Around cells mucilaginous sheaths, fine and diffluent of firm and lamelaed; the sheaths open at the apex during the division process (pseudovaginae). Cell content grey, blue-green or pinkish, usually finely granular, always without aerotopes. Thylakoids localized peripherally, +/- concentrically, sometimes, moreover, with several central localized, coiled thylakoids
|
| Genotype differences, molecular data:
|
Reproduction strategies, life cycles,
cell division:
Komárek & Anagnostidis (1998): Cell division always asymmetric, crosswise near the apex; the separated daughter cells (exocytes) are liberated from opened sheaths or are attached to the empty pseudovagina (origin of shrub-like or layered colonies) or remain in the common colonial mucilage (origin of gelatinous colonies with radially oriented cells). Reproduction by the liberation of exocytes from mother cells or from colonies.
Komárek (1992):Cells divide by_the crosswise fission, usually asymmetrically_near the apex ; sometimes develop the apical daughter cells (exocytes) repeatedly in a rapid sequence and form apical chains of exocytes. The cell division at the apical end can repeat several times. Exocytes are motile and join to the end of opened pseudovaginae or separate completely from the mother cell and attach to the substrate.
|
| Ultrastructure:
|
Taxonomic position, higher hierarchy:
Cyanophyceae, Chrooococcales, Chamaesiphonaceae
Notes to taxonomy, misinterpretations:
Komárek & Anagnostidis (1998): Several species (Chamaesiphon subglobosus, C. polonicus) are cultured as mono specific strains. In this case they grow in irregular groups, not forming characteristic colonies, C. subglobosus sometimes without sheaths (fig. 487). The heteropolarity is manifested in culture usually only by asymmetric cell division.
|
Ecology, ecophysiology, ecological significance:
Komárek (1992):Only freshwater species growing sessile on aquatic
plants, on other algae and on stones, on which they cause sometimes coloured
(yellow, brown, blackish-violet) spots. One species is epizoic on planktic
Crustaceans.
Many species have geographically limited areas of distribution; they are
characteristic mainly for communities of periphytic algae in mountain creeks
(the Alps, the Carpathians, etc.). However, the genus occurs all over the
world (different species in different frequences).
|
Physiology and biochemistry:
|
Distribution, endemism, problematic citations:
|
Reference strain:
|
Infrageneric scheme, species concept:
|
List of species:
Subgenus Chamaesiphon
Chamaesiphon africanus Schmidle 1902
Chamaesiphon amethystinus (Rostafinski) Lemmermann 1910
Chamaesiphon britannicus (Fritsch) Komárek et Anagnostidis 1995
Chamaesiphon carpaticus Starmach 1929
Chamaesiphon confervicola A. Braun in Rabenhorst 1865
Chamaesiphon cylindricus Boye-Petersen 1923
Chamaesiphon cylindrosporus Skuja 1948
Chamaesiphon halophilus Tavera et Komárek 1996
Chamaesiphon incrustans Grunow in Rabenhorst 1865
Chamaesiphon investiens Skuja 1964
Chamaesiphon jaoi Hällfors 1982
Chamaesiphon komarekii Rott 2008. Algological Studies 126: 39
Chamaesiphon longus Hällfors et Munsterhjelm 1982
Chamaesiphon macer Geitler 1925
Chamaesiphon major (Geitler) Komárek et Anagnostidis 1986
Chamaesiphon minimus Schmidle 1902
Chamaesiphon minutus (Rostafinski) Lemmermann 1910
Chamaesiphon portoricensis Gardner 1927
Chamaesiphon rostafinskii Hansgirg 1887
Chamaesiphon sideriphilus Starmach 1929
Chamaesiphon tibeticus Jao et al. 1974
Subgenus Godlewskia
Chamaesiphon aggregatus (Jaczewski) Geitler 1925
Chamaesiphon fallax Geilter 1933
Chamaesiphon fuscus (Rostafinski) Hansgirg 1888
Chamaesiphon geitleri Luther 1954
Chamaesiphon mollis Geitler 1933
Chamaesiphon niger (Starmach) Golubić 1967
Chamaesiphon ocobyrsiodes Geitler 1925
Chamaesiphon polonicus (Rostafinski) Hansgirg 1892
Chamaesiphon polymorphus Geitler 1925
Chamaesiphon starmachii Kann 1972
Chamaesiphon subglobosus (Rostafinski) Lemmermann 1910
Unclear taxa:
Chamaesiphon duran-milleri Gonzalez-Guerrero 1946
Chamaesiphon fuscoviolaceus (Hansgirg) Margalef 1952
Chamaesiphon hyalinus Scherffel 1907
Chamaesiphon marinus Wille et Rosenvinge 1885
Dermocarpa clavata Geitler sensu Chu et al. ed. 1991
|
| Keys:
|
| List of stains: |
Drawings:
Komárek (1992) |
| Application technology: |
Literature:
| |
2.1 taxonomy: Geitler 1925, Fritsch 1929, Geitler 1932, Geitler & Ruttner 1935, Behre 1961, Kann 1966, Starmach 1966, Backhaus 1967, Golubić 1967a, Golubić 1967b, Backhaus 1968, Starmach 1969, Bourrelly 1970, Kann 1972, Waterbury & Stanier 1977, Kann 1978, Gromov & Mamkaeva 1980, Hallfors & Munsterhjelm 1982, Komárek & Ludvík 1982, Wujek & Gretz 1984, Bourrelly 1985, Komárek & Anagnostidis 1986, Komárek 1989, Cantonati & al. 1996, Komárek & Anagnostidis 1998, |
| |
2.2 cytomorphology:
|
| |
2.3 16S rRNA sequencing:
|
| |
2.4 biology and life cycles:
|
| |
2.5 ecology:
|
|